Re: I think vorbis codec group have a new target
Sergei Steshenko <[email protected]> Sat, 4 Sep 2010 14:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.ogg.vorbis.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- On Sat, 9/4/10, Sergei Steshenko <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Sergei Steshenko <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Vorbis] I think vorbis codec group have a new target > To: [email protected], "David.Lin" <[email protected]> > Date: Saturday, September 4, 2010, 1:57 PM > > --- On Sat, 9/4/10, David.Lin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > From: David.Lin <[email protected]> > Subject: [Vorbis] I think vorbis codec group have a new > target > To: [email protected] > Date: Saturday, September 4, 2010, 1:31 PM > > I compared quicktime aac and vorbis,i think quicktime aac > is better than vorbis at 80Kbps. > please tell me if i'm wrong. > > using command: > qtaacenc.exe --tvbr 31 --highest --samplerate keep test.wav > qt.m4a > > oggenc2.exe --raw -q 1.6 test.wav -o vorbis.ogg > > the version: > qtaacenc version 20100725 with QuickTime 7.6.7 > OggEnc v2.87 (libvorbis 1.3.1) > > links: > qtaacenc:http://tmkk.hp.infoseek.co.jp/qtaacenc/ > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > Vorbis mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/vorbis > > Why did you choose "-q 1.6" ? > > Regards, > Sergei. > > And why did you use "--raw" ? Regards, Sergei.