Re: I think vorbis codec group have a new target
Gregory Maxwell <[email protected]> Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:09:37 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.ogg.vorbis.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 4:31 PM, David.Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > I compared quicktime aac and vorbis,i think quicktime aac is better than > vorbis at 80Kbps. > please tell me if i'm wrong. How could we? You've provided absolutely no data nor information about how you conducted the test. I recommend you use a blind listening test tool such as http://ff123.net/abchr/abchr.html and actually post the data. Make sure your testing set includes the original uncompressed audio. You may also find it useful to also test the latest aotuv development version http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/test.html which is believed to represent the best in the current development of vorbis, and some AAC-LC encoder (if quicktime is not already AAC-LC), since some devices are only AAC-LC compatible at least in combination with video.