Re: Mac OS X 1.9m96 build success/questions

At 11:22 AM +0200 4/28/05, Eric Hoch wrote:
>Hi Terry,
>Am Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:25:52 -0700, schrieb Terry Teague:
>> At 10:33 AM +0200 4/27/05, Eric Hoch wrote:
>>> Hi Terry,
>>> Am Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:34:41 -0700, schrieb Terry Teague:
>>
>>
>>> It is supposed to be executed automatically but you can also
>>> execute it by hand.
>>>
>>> Therefore you use "solenv/bin/createMetapackage.sh <language code>"
>>> e.g.
>>>
>>> "solenv/bin/createMetapackage.sh en-US" for en_US builds
>>> "solenv/bin/createMetapackage.sh de" for german builds
>>> etc.
>>
>>
>> I ran the script manually, and it successfully created the ".mpkg". I
>> wonder if the script wasn't executed automatically because I didn't specify
>> a language on the configure command line (I assumed a default of en-US).
>
>See Florian's answer.


I don't think I have seen an answer from Florian on this subject. Not a
problem.


>:-) Well at least my build instructions aren't that worse then.
>Could you please send me your corrections. I updated the build
>instructions with what I could read out between the lines in your
>email but I didn't commit it now because I wanted to have your full
>change log for them. You can send your changes to this list or to
>me as a private message. Thank you.


I will do that in a couple of days hopefully.


>Is the mozilla package error due to my "wrong" patches or is it due
>to a problem with m95? I have tried to find the problem but with my
>m95 sources and my patches I get Mozilla deliverd so for me my
>patches work.


I didn't build 1.9m95, and I didn't have a problem with delivering Mozilla
with 1.9m96. I will probably try some of the other Mozilla build options
such as building from source, to see if that works.


>I also hopefully made clear now that *only* Darwinport users need
>the freetyp2 patches.


I will review the updated instructions when they are available (after I
have sent you my changes).


>Regards,
>Eric Hoch


Regards, Terry