Re: Mac OS X builds of 1.9m93 are available at good-day

Terry Teague <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.porting
Message-ID <l03130300be978caac778@[17.219.130.175]>
At 12:11 AM +0200 4/27/05, Florian Heckl wrote:
>Hi Terry,
>
>On 24.04.2005, at 05:03, Terry Teague wrote:
>
>> So I ended up downloading Florian's pre-built Mozilla binaries, and
>> applying your Mozilla patch. Now Mozilla in OOo builds fine (from the
>> pre-built binaries).
>>
>> But my current problem I haven't been able to get past yet. This is a
>> messy
>> area, and I have read all the old EMails on the subject and checked all
>> known Mac OS X SRC680 issues, but I don't have a solution yet.
>>
>> The problem is the libxmlsec module - it doesn't build because of the
>> following error (during its configure):
>>
>> ...
>> checking libxml2   no  ... checking for libxml2 libraries >= 2.4.2...
>> checking libxml2   ./libxml2-config  ... yes ('')
>> checking for libxslt libraries >= 1.0.20... no
>> checking for openssl libraries >= 0.9.6... no
>> checking for gnutls libraries >= 0.8.1... no
>> checking for nspr libraries >= 4.0... no
>> checking for nss libraries >= 3.2... no
>> checking for crypto library... configure: error: At least one crypto
>> library should exist for xmlsec1
>> dmake:  Error code 1, while making
>> './unxmacxp.pro/misc/build/so_configured_so_xmlsec1'
>> ...
>>
>Can you please confirm that you have



I'm sorry, somehow I overlooked your EMail earlier, and it wasn't until I
saw Eric's EMail today that I wondered what he was talking about. My
apologies also to Tino Rachui, because had I answered Florian's EMail
earlier, we might have had the real solution.


>solver/680/unxmacxp.pro/lib/libnss3.dylib
>solver/680/unxmacxp.pro/inc/mozilla/nss/nss.h
>?
>I ask it because very early versions of my Mozilla packages were packed
>incorrectly which would lead to the moz project not delivering
>everything to the correct place. I replaced them very soon though. But
>it may be your problem.


Unfortunately I have now thrown away the 1.9m93 build, so I can't answer
these questions. But since I had several attempts to build the Mozilla
pieces, I can believe there might some problems with dependencies. If I had
done a clean build (each time), I might have had a different result.


I will keep an eye out for this problem in future builds.


>If those files are in their correct place, can you give us the
>config.log?


I do keep the patch/configure/build logs. Next time if I have a problem I
can provide that.


>Best regards,
>Florian


Regards, Terry
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.