Re: M109 on MacOSX 10.4
James McKenzie <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.porting |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tino Rachui - Sun Germany - Development - Software Engineer wrote: > James, > > James McKenzie wrote: > >>> Today, I removed pkgsrc and swich back to fink again. >>> >>> Build dependencies for me is: >>> fink install gtk+2 >>> >>> >> Looks like I am getting a corrupt file when I try this: >> >> docbkx412.zip. >> >> I tried downloading it from the Oasis web/ftp site and it is corrupt >> there. Sent the webmaster a message advising of this. Did you need >> DocBook support to complete the installation of the gtk+2 package? >> >> BTW, it looks like I will have more free time this week than I >> originally planned on, but I will be very busy and only have time to >> troubleshoot a few problems. >> >> Also, I would like to ask other folks on the list what they are using >> to get gtk+2 support running? > > > your problems sound a little bit familiar to me. When I started > building OOo on my Mac a few weeks ago I stepped into the same > problems with fink and gtk+. > > 2. Though I installed gtk+2 and other available gtk+? packages I was not > able to build mozilla until I realized that what fink did install were > only the gtk+? sources. I still had to do a 'make' and 'make install' > in order to really install these packages on my Mac. Before doing this > pkgconfig did not show any of the gtk+? packages in the list of > available packages. This is fixed now. I had to visit two different sites and apply two patches and reset the configure line. Then I ran the patches for gtk+2 from Fink. I then edited the Makefile in the gdk directory to add in the library files for jpeg (-ljpeg) in the BASE_DEPENDENCIES_LIBS line. I then ran make and then make install through sudo. I then build mozilla and it appears successful. Should this be an IZ so that others that follow can use this? Thank you. James McKenzie