Re: M109 on MacOSX 10.4
James McKenzie <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.porting |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tino Rachui - Sun Germany - Development - Software Engineer wrote: > James, > > James McKenzie wrote: > >>> Today, I removed pkgsrc and swich back to fink again. >>> >>> Build dependencies for me is: >>> fink install gtk+2 >>> >>> >> Looks like I am getting a corrupt file when I try this: >> >> docbkx412.zip. >> >> I tried downloading it from the Oasis web/ftp site and it is corrupt >> there. Sent the webmaster a message advising of this. Did you need >> DocBook support to complete the installation of the gtk+2 package? >> >> BTW, it looks like I will have more free time this week than I >> originally planned on, but I will be very busy and only have time to >> troubleshoot a few problems. >> >> Also, I would like to ask other folks on the list what they are using >> to get gtk+2 support running? > > > your problems sound a little bit familiar to me. When I started > building OOo on my Mac a few weeks ago I stepped into the same > problems with fink and gtk+. > > 1. During installation of gtk+2 a got a corrupt file message too though > I do not remember if it was the same file (docbkx412.zip). Ignoring this > file had no further negative impact. > > 2. Though I installed gtk+2 and other available gtk+? packages I was not > able to build mozilla until I realized that what fink did install were > only the gtk+? sources. I still had to do a 'make' and 'make install' > in order to really install these packages on my Mac. Before doing this > pkgconfig did not show any of the gtk+? packages in the list of > available packages. > > I'm not sure if I did something wrong but this was the way for me to get > gtk+? installed properly and be able to build mozilla. > > Does pkgconfig show you gtk+? in the list of available packages? > I've decided to submit a bug report to Fink. It appears that this is broken in Tiger. At this time I am dropping the use of OpenOffice in favor of Office for Mac. I have licenses for it and I definately need a working system. Sorry folks, but Microsoft won this battle. James McKenzie