Re: M109 on MacOSX 10.4

James McKenzie <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.porting
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Tino Rachui - Sun Germany - Development - Software Engineer wrote:

> James,
>
> James McKenzie wrote:
>
>>> Today, I removed pkgsrc and swich back to fink again.
>>>
>>> Build dependencies for me is:
>>> fink install gtk+2
>>>  
>>>
>> Looks like I am getting a corrupt file when I try this:
>>
>> docbkx412.zip.
>>
>> I tried downloading it from the Oasis web/ftp site and it is corrupt 
>> there.  Sent the webmaster a message advising of this.  Did you need 
>> DocBook support to complete the installation of the gtk+2 package?
>>
>> BTW, it looks like I will have more free time this week than I 
>> originally planned on, but I will be very busy and only have time to 
>> troubleshoot a few problems.
>>
>> Also, I would like to ask other folks on the list what they are using 
>> to get gtk+2 support running?
>
>
> your problems sound a little bit familiar to me. When I started 
> building OOo on my Mac a few weeks ago I stepped into the same 
> problems with fink and gtk+.
>
> 1. During installation of gtk+2 a got a corrupt file message too though
> I do not remember if it was the same file (docbkx412.zip). Ignoring this
> file had no further negative impact.
>
> 2. Though I installed gtk+2 and other available gtk+? packages I was not
> able to build mozilla until I realized that what fink did install were 
> only the gtk+? sources. I still had to do a 'make' and 'make install' 
> in order to really install these packages on my Mac. Before doing this 
> pkgconfig did not show any of the gtk+? packages in the list of 
> available packages.
>
> I'm not sure if I did something wrong but this was the way for me to get
> gtk+? installed properly and be able to build mozilla.
>
> Does pkgconfig show you gtk+? in the list of available packages?
>
I've decided to submit a bug report to Fink.  It appears that this is 
broken in Tiger.  At this time I am dropping the use of OpenOffice in 
favor of Office for Mac.  I have licenses for it and I definately need a 
working system.  Sorry folks, but Microsoft won this battle.

James McKenzie
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.