Re: Mac OS X 10.4 + 1.9m109 ja version (Re: [porting-dev] M109 on MacOSX 10.4)

   From: Eric Hoch <[email protected]>
   Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:18:24 +0200

   > > what does it mean "rc"? It suggests it is of release quality.
   > 
   > No it doesn't.

Yes it does. RC is well known "mark" for Release Candidate.

   > This servers has always been the more or lesse official Server for Mac
   > OS X builds still in development. Don't know why Stefan Taxhet called
   > the directory MacOSXrc back when the Server was made available.
   >
   > Feel free to ask him and ask for a change of the name.

Stefan, can you please rename it to e.g. MacOSX only?

   > I wouldn't call Mac OS X Alpha Quality. If m79 was beta quality for 
   > the major plattforms then this Mac OS X build is beyond it. The 
   > known issues are only partly caused by OOo - and the big X11 bus is 
   > caused by Apple and we're even working on a solution for this. 

Does sound work in it? Do all wizards work too? Does Base work correctly?
I know what is the status of MacOS X. No need to use "marketing" talk about
its quality. I only care about the technical issues.

   > For the 1.1.x series we had builds on this server who were worse in
   > quality then this build.

This is no argument.
-- 
Pavel JanĂ­k

... they keep asking "Can Emacs do this?" but the corrent question is "How
can I make Emacs to do this?"
                  -- Someone on /.