Re: [Mac OS X / X11 ] Proposition of baseline for 2.0 and 2.0.1

"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:32:08 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.porting
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Eric,

Eric Hoch a écrit :

>>For 2.0 , following what was  recently proposed on releases 
>>mailing list, we will (try to) provide official and experimental 
>>builds, like described above.  If none disagree,and if nothing's  
>>wrong, I propose to complete and update the porting web site 
>>about this baseline (Eric, may you please complete?)

> Which server URL to use good-day? Stardiv? 


Excuse me, I was not precise :

Builds (means the process from sources, until packaging ): Maho does

The build process is now well known, and we must concentrate our efforts 
around development and communication to improve the visibility and 
transparency of Mac OS X porting project.

About where the user can download can download the build, I have still 
no idea : maybe Stefan can help here ?
I guess we will use both  (more safe ), because Maho is able to provide 
a dedicated location.
Mirors are important too because they will help to save Maho's bandpath.

>>Build is made using Mac OS X 10.3  (aka Panther ).
>>Minimal version required : 10.3.4 (10.3.8.adviced)

[...cut...]

> Some questions here:
> 
> Is --disable-cups really needed? ./configure runs through if I use 
> enable or disable cups and I can see no difference in the finished 
> build. So can someone please explain me if it's better to 
> disable-cups or enable-cups. 

> In addittion I need to use --disable-gnome-vfs otherwise 
> ./configure breaks for me - at least with m126. I haven't checked 
> it with higher milestones yet. 

Looks like it was a good idea to talk about the exact configure command 
line  :-)

Yes, you're right : I have given this command line as example, and the 
exact content will be completely defined with all comments, no problem.

> What I cannot use because of a version conflict between Darwinports 
> and X11 is --with-system-freetype but thanks to Florian a patch 
> exists. 

If a compatibility patch does exist, it must be integrated. Can you send 
me this patch, please ?


> Thank you for coordinating our efforts and I hope that my comments 
> will be of any use. 

They are : thank you !   :-)


Kind regards,
eric bachard

-- 
<[email protected]>
Francophone OpenOffice.org Community developer ( Linux PPC and Mac OS X 
/ X11)
See : <http://fr.openoffice.org>