Re: [Mac OS X / X11 ] Proposition of baseline for 2.0 and 2.0.1
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:32:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.porting |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Eric, Eric Hoch a écrit : >>For 2.0 , following what was recently proposed on releases >>mailing list, we will (try to) provide official and experimental >>builds, like described above. If none disagree,and if nothing's >>wrong, I propose to complete and update the porting web site >>about this baseline (Eric, may you please complete?) > Which server URL to use good-day? Stardiv? Excuse me, I was not precise : Builds (means the process from sources, until packaging ): Maho does The build process is now well known, and we must concentrate our efforts around development and communication to improve the visibility and transparency of Mac OS X porting project. About where the user can download can download the build, I have still no idea : maybe Stefan can help here ? I guess we will use both (more safe ), because Maho is able to provide a dedicated location. Mirors are important too because they will help to save Maho's bandpath. >>Build is made using Mac OS X 10.3 (aka Panther ). >>Minimal version required : 10.3.4 (10.3.8.adviced) [...cut...] > Some questions here: > > Is --disable-cups really needed? ./configure runs through if I use > enable or disable cups and I can see no difference in the finished > build. So can someone please explain me if it's better to > disable-cups or enable-cups. > In addittion I need to use --disable-gnome-vfs otherwise > ./configure breaks for me - at least with m126. I haven't checked > it with higher milestones yet. Looks like it was a good idea to talk about the exact configure command line :-) Yes, you're right : I have given this command line as example, and the exact content will be completely defined with all comments, no problem. > What I cannot use because of a version conflict between Darwinports > and X11 is --with-system-freetype but thanks to Florian a patch > exists. If a compatibility patch does exist, it must be integrated. Can you send me this patch, please ? > Thank you for coordinating our efforts and I hope that my comments > will be of any use. They are : thank you ! :-) Kind regards, eric bachard -- <[email protected]> Francophone OpenOffice.org Community developer ( Linux PPC and Mac OS X / X11) See : <http://fr.openoffice.org>