Re: --disable-epm

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 03:45:59PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> I assume that in those scenarios smoketestoo_native is not built (as =20
> there is no installation set to smoke test), right?  We could re-design=
 =20

Yep

> this, and even with --disable-epm build an installation set in archive =
=20
> format in instsetoo_native, so that also in these scenarios =20
> smoketestoo_native could be built (and potentially other tests that =20
> require a full OOo installation could also be executed).  What do peopl=
e =20
> think?

I'd make this optional. (And executable as a separate step). I don't thin=
k
we should "waste" the time it needs to build a not-used installset, espec=
ially
on slow architectures.

Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,

Rene