Re: --disable-epm

On 01/07/10 15:50, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 03:45:59PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>> I assume that in those scenarios smoketestoo_native is not built (as  
>> there is no installation set to smoke test), right?  We could re-design  
> 
> Yep
> 
>> this, and even with --disable-epm build an installation set in archive  
>> format in instsetoo_native, so that also in these scenarios  
>> smoketestoo_native could be built (and potentially other tests that  
>> require a full OOo installation could also be executed).  What do people  
>> think?
> 
> I'd make this optional. (And executable as a separate step). I don't think
> we should "waste" the time it needs to build a not-used installset, especially
> on slow architectures.

I'll leave things as they are, then; at least for now.

-Stephan