Re: [native-lang] UPDATE: Get Started with IRC

Ian Lynch <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.openoffice.nativelanguage
Organization ZMS Ltd
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 11:49, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> Charles-H.Schulz wrote:
> 
> > Most people I know who are recent switchers love Gaim "because they can 
> > use MSN (or Yahoo, or AIM)" with it, but they don't really understand 
> > IRC. But I guess that I'm a particular case, because I *hate* IM, and 
> > prefer IRC... ;-)
> 
> IRC is very complex for most people. I agree with you, I like IRC much 
> better. But most people couldn't figure it out.

I'm very new to IRC. I use Xchat because it came with Mandrake. I found
it pretty easy to use, but then I don't do anyhting much with it.

> This is a place where I think *Jabber* will come to our rescue. In terms 
> of ease of use, Jabber is pretty close to IM.

I have heard of Jabber but I have never used it.

>  But in terms of reatures, 
> it's probably better than IRC. It has pretty much all the things you 
> expect from IRC. Jabber chat rooms behave just the same as IRC channels. 
> 
> Jabber has a multiple-server model, like IRC. But, for example, you don't 
> need to login to a server. I am registered in the server jabber.org, my 
> login is '[email protected]' (notice that it looks like an email 
> address). If you are '[email protected]' I can talk to you 
> directly without having to login to Wanadoo's server.
> 
> We can also make a room, just like in IRC. For example, I just made a room 
> for OOo, the Jabber address is '[email protected]'.
> 
> But Jabber can also be used like a regular (simple) IM client, and just 
> talk to you "buddies". So Jabber has the potential to keep everyone happy, 
> from the geek and Aunt Tillie.
> 
> Go Jabber!

Maybe I need to look at Jabber. When I get a minute!

-- 
Ian Lynch <[email protected]>
ZMS Ltd
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.