Re: [native-lang] Re: [l10n-dev] N. Korean localization : Impossible?

Hi Jeongkyu,

Jeongkyu Kim a écrit :
[...]

  >
> Hello Charles and others,
> 
> I personally talked to IlYong when they started NK version, but no more 
> than that. Several days ago, as 2.0 release approaches, I was also 
> wondering if their work is going good. But I realized from his post that 
> there was problem at least on OpenOffice.org side, unfortunately.
> 
>  From the L10n discussion on this matter, it seems to be the most 
> practical solution to maintain his patches outside of OpenOffice.org 
> server. However, the most practical does not mean the best or the 
> reasonable. I hope that we (volunteers in L10n and NL projects) can keep 
> working on this matter until we get reasonable solution.
> 
> I believe that the first step should be asking Sun to give us _formal 
> explanation_. In fact, when those patches were rejected due to Sun's 
> legal matter, they should have given formal explanation on it. IlYong 
> and we may work together to write down a inquiry to Sun.

I feel this is the best to do. We have speak about this issue on the 
dev@fr list, because one of our member is an expert of IP and have work 
in several different countries.
 From this link, it seems that OOo is not mentionned :
https://www.sun.com/sales/its/software/software.html
here is the more general public link about sales and restrictions :
http://www.sun.com/sales/its/

 From what Alex (our member) said the solution proposed by David could 
be one, but on the other hand, Sun would have the obligation to inform 
Sales US Dpt of a secondary transfer of technology.
I'll keep you informet of the discussion.

Kind regards
Sophie


> 
> Please let me know your opinion on my suggestion.
> 
> Regards,
> Jeongkyu
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
>