[Fwd: Re: [native-lang] 2.0setup guides in your language.]

On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:03:05 +0200, Charles-H.Schulz wrote:

> Really? OOops...I still can't see your message, and it seems it never
> quite got out to me :-( ...
> Thanks then!
> Charles.

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: G. Roderick Singleton <[email protected]>
To: NL List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [native-lang] 2.0setup guides in your language.
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 16:39:39 -0400

On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 22:50 +0300, Ain Vagula wrote:
> G. Roderick Singleton:
> > Well consensus is that we need a setup guide for 2.x. Since we are in
> > development stages, there is little we can document as yet for the final
> > release but I would appeal to everyone on this list to try to put
> > together an outline of what they think should go into it. I have opened
> > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=37513 for this purpose.
> >
> > Hopefully we will catch all the topics that need covering by doing it
> > this way and the net result will be a setup guide that is ready when the
> > release arrives.
> >
> > If your setup guide maintainer has left or no longer wishes to maintain the
> > document, please post your translation to the issue so I can put it in its
> > proper place. Please remember to give the two letter id for your
> > translation.
> 
> There is a misleading line in 'rpm' chapter (removing part).
> "Another method is to use rpm -qa openofficeorg\*...."

No doubt. This thing is in active edit mode and typos et cetera are
bound to creep in as no one is proofing at the moment.

> Should be:
> "Another method is to use rpm -e `rpm -qa openofficeorg\*`....".
> Simply rpm -qa openofficeorg\* will not remove any packages as warned in the 
> next sentence :)
> 
> Sorry, when I understood something wrong...
> 

If anyone spots something like this in the future, please add it to the
issue otherwise it will likely get lost.
-- 
PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST.
OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead
http://documentation.openoffice.org/