Re: UK version of 3.3

Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
> On 2011-02-02, at 10:35 , Stefan Taxhet (sonews) wrote:
>> On 02.02.2011 16:25, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>>> On 2011-02-02, at 10:19 , Stefan Taxhet (sonews) wrote:
>>>> On 02.02.2011 15:17, Marcus Lange wrote:

Hi Louis,

>>> Sending to the RC10 seems better,
>> That would not be my favorite choice. As Marcus explained the RCs are not approved yet. That's why I thought the other.html might be better as it gives the choice to pick 3.2.1 or follow the link to the RC.
> 
> Why not add just a caveat to the link, "Not fully tested, use at your own risk. For a proven version, use 3.x.x" (3.2.1, in this case).

there are already hints on webpages (download.openoffice.org, see the 
yellow box and download.openoffice.org/all_rc.html, see the disclaimer 
text).

Clearer hints were denied by UX as it let the RCs appear in a too 
negative light.

>>> or sending to the NLC.
>> Yes, for languages that have a NLC project with a proper download page. I'm not aware of one for en-GB.
> 
> I do suppose that is right. 
> 
> Meanwhile, I'd be interested in getting the en-GB version finalized and would like to know what I can do to assist. Eg., a blog entry, a call for effort, that sort of thing.

@Stuart:
Is there anything Louis can help or assist you with?

Thanks

Marcus