Re: UK version of 3.3

Hi
On 2011-02-02, at 11:05 , Marcus Lange wrote:

> Louis Su=E1rez-Potts wrote:
>> On 2011-02-02, at 10:35 , Stefan Taxhet (sonews) wrote:
>>> On 02.02.2011 16:25, Louis Su=E1rez-Potts wrote:
>>>> On 2011-02-02, at 10:19 , Stefan Taxhet (sonews) wrote:
>>>>> On 02.02.2011 15:17, Marcus Lange wrote:
>=20
> Hi Louis,
>=20
>>>> Sending to the RC10 seems better,
>>> That would not be my favorite choice. As Marcus explained the RCs =
are not approved yet. That's why I thought the other.html might be =
better as it gives the choice to pick 3.2.1 or follow the link to the =
RC.
>> Why not add just a caveat to the link, "Not fully tested, use at your =
own risk. For a proven version, use 3.x.x" (3.2.1, in this case).
>=20
> there are already hints on webpages (download.openoffice.org, see the =
yellow box and download.openoffice.org/all_rc.html, see the disclaimer =
text).

Evidently=85 it's not enough.

>=20
> Clearer hints were denied by UX as it let the RCs appear in a too =
negative light.

At this point, that's a little moot, don't you think?
>=20
>>>> or sending to the NLC.
>>> Yes, for languages that have a NLC project with a proper download =
page. I'm not aware of one for en-GB.
>> I do suppose that is right. Meanwhile, I'd be interested in getting =
the en-GB version finalized and would like to know what I can do to =
assist. Eg., a blog entry, a call for effort, that sort of thing.
>=20
> @Stuart:
> Is there anything Louis can help or assist you with?

We can start by simply posting a call for action on dev@marketing or =
discuss@ooo

>=20
> Thanks
>=20
> Marcus

louis