Re: [cowiki-dev] coWiki definition

On 01 Apr 21:46, PAUL HANCHETT wrote:

Hello Paul,

> >The are missing important things like XML storage and the extremely
> >variable plugin architecture. These topic were important especially to me
> >and are

> I understand that these are important characteristics to you as a 
> developer.  But why would a non-technical user care how the text is 
> stored?  The user can't even see it.  A user can access plugins, but the 
> normal user probably won't notice them unless they have an advanced need. 

Yes, you are right, but it can not harm to mentions these special features.
These are the feature that could make coWiki big in the future, because they
are unusual and cool. Do you know any other wiki that saves its data in XML
and is (would be theoretically) able to export and import data this way?

I do not. Other do not too. So we need to tell them that this is the right
horse they ride.

But why do I write this? You are able to judge yourself what information is
good and which is not. It was just as proposal. You care about the project
:)

> This description is a brief non-technical description of user visible 
> characteristics.  It was intended to be brief and succinct.  Don't you 
> think it succeeds?  :-)

I would like to have more features listed that are beyond other wikis and
make coWiki special, very special :)

dtg