Re: [cowiki-dev] New feature implementations and bug fixes

Actually, everyone seemed to have their own pet projects that they 
preferred to work on.  There wasn't much point in my asking for 
something in particular to get fixed.  I think you'll find that there 
are some issues assigned that are still open from some months ago.  :-)

Daniel T. Gorski wrote:

>On 29 Jun 21:12, Sy wrote:
>
>  
>
>>We need to finalise our milestone goals and then make sure that all
>>features are assigned to the right milestones.  This would give us a
>>list of the features which are important goals for the next major
>>release.
>>    
>>
>
>Yes, ACK, if we would have volunteers who can reach the milestones - already
>given by after the Boron release by Paul. I mean, if nodbody (except Archie)
>cares about the code at that time, a milestone does mean nothing... at least
>I have no information about other activities...
>
>"Do code" (not especially you personally [1]) something first or manage
>productive coders you can rely on, before you can estimate and ask for how
>long it takes to fullfill a milestone target.
>
>regards dtg
>
>[1] This is why I want to get coWiki a bit (only a bit) more popular, and
>this includes the coWiki.org website
>presentation/up-to-date-information/visions content. I mean we should
>recruit more people who are interessted _and_ could contribute and not only
>talk about their intention.
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>  
>