Re: Some docs help

Guyren G Howe wrote:

>> like i said .. you would have to have multiple entries. in which  case 
>> you would have to remove the primary key .. and you venture  into 
>> untested territory.
> 
> 
> Then why not put the auth_container_name on liveuser_users, and  
> everything would work fine? Put another way: the current scheme seems  
> wrong. The auth_container is surely a property of the authorization,  
> not of the user.

because that would be useless.

1) it would require modification in the auth source which we have ruled 
out (remember people could be using an LDAP database as their 
authentication source..)

2) if i have the perm_user_id i would still not be able to match this 
with an auth user unless the perm_user_id is stored in the auth 
container database which is clumsy and also violates the principles of 
liveuser (see 1) again)

regards,
Lukas