Re: Re: literal and javascript

Does IT - not my side ????? this is all I want !!!!

 > For one, I'd expect this to work as it does right now (taken from the 
Smarty
 > docs):
 >     {literal}
 >     SYNTAX EXAMPLES:
 >     {func var="test `$foo.bar` test"} <-- sees $foo.bar
 >     {/literal}

Pete M
The biggest smarty fan in wales (maybe)


Mark Rogers wrote:

> Pete writes:
> 
>>I think some have missed my point.
>>The idea is to use backticks as delimiters within javascript code
>>enclosed between {literal} tags
> 
> 
> I agree that dropping in and out of {literal} is a pain, although I also
> agree with others that {literal} should do what it says, so I'd probably
> agree with {literal backticks=1} or similar, but not modifying the default
> {literal} behaviour.
> 
> For one, I'd expect this to work as it does right now (taken from the Smarty
> docs):
>     {literal}
>     SYNTAX EXAMPLES:
>     {func var="test `$foo.bar` test"} <-- sees $foo.bar
>     {/literal}
> 
> I'd be interested in your views on my suggested {script}{/script} block
> handling, in the "Intelligent JavaScript handling" thread, as I think this
> would do what you need?
> 

-- 
Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php