Re: no product version number in Windows binaries of Ghostscript
Chris Liddell <[email protected]> Fri, 7 Dec 2018 22:44:23 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.printing.ghostscript.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGy8pWoT-3ZphvaPybnZDEPShRVjuv9sZrHcL0J+1e6vUFfFYQ@mail.gmail.com> |
I don't fully understand: are you saying this version number *used* to be present, and isn't any more? Because I can't see any evidence we ever included it, and I'm certainly not aware of a recent(iish) change that would have removed it. Or just that it's not present, and you want us to include the field (that Microsoft's documentation explicitly says is optional)? Chris On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 21:40, Jörg Jenderek <[email protected]> wrote: > > no product version number in Windows binaries of Ghostscript > > Hello, > > The Windows binary executable "gswin32.exe" and "gswin32c.exe" contain > no version number of type "major.minor.release.minorRelease". I > explicitly see this item for 32 bit software Ghostscript version > 9.23/9.26 and some older variants. > > This is only a cosmetic problem at first glance. But well behaved > Windows executables should have this field. Some other software use > and rely on this meta information inside file header. > > I use a software called SUMo found at > https://www.kcsoftwares.com/?sumo to look for older/out dated > software, which needs to be updated. Apparently this software use the > product version to took/decide for software updates. For Ghostscript > this field is missing. So Sumo never realize that installed > Ghostscript version is too old. > > By accident i myself read about security issues concerning Postscript > and checked manually for installed Ghostscript. So i realized that on > my Window systems Ghostscript software was out dated. > > So i would be nice if Windows binaries contain the desired product > version number. > > Thanks > -- > Jörg Jenderek >