Re: An indeterminizm in GS_8_1X

"Igor V. Melichev" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.printing.ghostscript.patches
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Here is another one being similar to the 2nd :
http://www.ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-cvs/2003-December/003925.html

Igor.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ralph Giles" <[email protected]>
To: "Igor V. Melichev" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 1:48 AM
Subject: Re: [gs-code-review] An indeterminizm in GS_8_1X


> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 09:00:25PM +0300, Igor V. Melichev wrote:
>
> > The patch
> > http://www.ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-cvs/2003-December/003923.html
> > probably should be committed to GS_8_1X.
>
> This seems safe enough to me. Ray, what do you think? We need to roll a
new release anyway for the
> freetype license exemption.
>
> > Another patch
> > http://www.ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-cvs/2003-December/003924.html
> > should be pretty safe and useful.
>
> This also seems like a clean bugfix to me, but less critical than the
first.
>
>  -r
> _______________________________________________
> gs-code-review mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.ghostscript.com/mailman/listinfo/gs-code-review
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.