Re: An indeterminizm in GS_8_1X

Ralph,

While these look like useful fixes, they haven't had independent
regression test and compatibility tests against 8.12. Let's just
get 8.13 out with the minimal risk.

Had these patches come in prior to the 8.12 release, we would
have held them up for post 8.12, so I think we should apply the
same guidelines now.

Any customer or user that trips over these issues can apply the
patch.

BTW, when is 8.13 going to be ready ??? (customers are waiting).

Regards,
Ray
________________________________________________________________

Ralph Giles wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 09:00:25PM +0300, Igor V. Melichev wrote:
> 
> 
>>The patch
>>http://www.ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-cvs/2003-December/003923.html
>>probably should be committed to GS_8_1X.
> 
> 
> This seems safe enough to me. Ray, what do you think? We need to roll a new release anyway for the 
> freetype license exemption.
> 
> 
>>Another patch 
>>http://www.ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-cvs/2003-December/003924.html
>>should be pretty safe and useful.
> 
> 
> This also seems like a clean bugfix to me, but less critical than the first.
> 
>  -r
> 
> .
>