Re: preliminary wts-in-clist patch |

Raph,

Since you are going out of town soon, and since this code is not
usually exercised (by the regression suite or the rest of us), why
not go ahead and commit it.

It is MUCH easier for me to 'svn up' than to apply a patch, and
I can always "freeze" a working version to an earlier rev. if I
don't want this in.

I'll try to get the patch to apply (Windows patch tools are flaky)
and build and test it, but I'd recommend doing the commit as long
as the "normal" (non WTS i.e., /AccurateScreens false) case works.

Regards,
Ray
____________________________________________________________________

Raph Levien wrote:
>    Here is my current snapshot of the wts-in-clist patch. There are a
> few optimizations and memory tweaks I still plan to do (like handling
> NULL alloc cases, and using the standard gs memory structure for the
> internal WTS state), but this should at the very least get images
> working in the banded wts case.