DWB and Plan 9 troff relationship (was: Potential bug in sv geometry)
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.printing.groff.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20251123214145.yv3j3objxokfoz25@illithid> |
At 2025-11-23T22:13:29+0100, onf wrote: > Also note that Plan 9 troff is a direct descendant of DWB troff I thought this too for a while, but it is not true, at least of the versions of these software projects that are available to us. DWB troff and Plan 9 troff diverged. The differing feature sets of their tbl(1)s suffices to prove this point. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff-commit/2025-10/msg00131.html https://github.com/9fans/plan9port/tree/master/src/cmd/tbl https://github.com/n-t-roff/DWB3.3/tree/master/text/tbl Regards, Branden
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEh3PWHWjjDgcrENwa0Z6cfXEmbc4FAmkjf5kACgkQ0Z6cfXEm bc70ag/+JcniGwQHJ/EBDlbsZuVrIMKf4zLkvh6csGfbs73e5IACdpQFYEJc0LA8 TLZBDj4hHKv76pQ/hwmVjnElcrdwslWyVMSiyrj2QdpveQbAio8beYKUpSgA4yBJ nTcs7vYKxTnpnayPq36d7zMdc3zstPo5FuGsJGgCoMmW4K66+quv3lP+ruPg4cYW L6owtzn5pPrNBgFlWJKSiCJOaX0dKpOSfo6A8hWKHoUPHy/OZ+VuRZuZ29U204L2 7jqEjJaIUGAYhMbI6QRn+5u51tVZaRottIFyZcrIGk3131kDbbAARvdjXCk8qO/y GaxcbAn3VpUEbGEtpjZR1SWZw9tyHho8JH7rstji3yBXf3EHPqHOP+KEvG+jvzNU T+yvD0jJGMFlNXB31F+iYJkIgBiFew47L+HeG4OLhM/uvDq3AHoqZ5g+pvjQVw2y DO0PUS/j1w0lCmzfeJDmWwoEB+FXLuwD4r7JO2J5p8g5+6tjYN5ZFG+6Op7CuoAv fZ3n4yGzDFH0gDVPaDaixxzlW0EqFRRxWEUr9pDeb0njHbqHFkChG5T+VHy2WT0M LtXAa8J7p7Un7VA9Uf2o0nJ4gpCSMKfelJmrA0LhYcOeE7lz34vSOnWfZPz914L8 u6N2/fuoNUB8idZBkfpNXsumrlstb2ZqPLoduen9u2RwIKub8Hk= =bsX8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----