Re: Has DDD reached it's embracing tipping point or not?

We always use DDD to build applications that handle complex business
processes (mostly in the financial deparment). No other methodology proved
cheaper in that context.

However, outside of this niche, we have found less value into an ubiquitous
language, probably because development teams are smaller and most of value
is in mathematical or technological skills.

Giacomo

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Willem van Gool <[email protected]>wrote:

> **
>
>
> About five or six years ago, I picked up the Blue Book because I was
> looking for better ways to design and code the systems I was working on
> then. I guess that as many of you who visit this forum regularly have been
> on a quest to find better methods to design and code our software-systems
> than the transaction-scripty, data set oriented systems we have been
> working on for years. Unfortunately, few people within our company (size
> about 300) are familiar with DDD-concepts, and because of all corporate
> standards are based on the old, data-oriented methods of engineering and
> architecture, it has been really tough convincing people to 'give it a try'.
>
> On the other hand, especially with the release of Vaughn's book just
> recently, which is in excellent read by the way, I have the feeling that
> DDD is really starting to take off everywhere. This got me wondering about
> the world-wide adoption of DDD: has your company embraced it completely (or
> do you apply it often as a independent consultant), or is it still
> considered 'just a hype' by your peers?
>  
>