Re: XP vs. "Traditional"
"davehane" <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Mar 2003 22:28:13 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-customering |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- In [email protected], Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> wrote: > As Bill has pointed out, there are no apples to apples > comparisons, and my guess is that there never will be. One > reason is that there are few, if any, apples to apples > comparisons of /any/ two methods. The problem is > finding the apples to compare. > > I wish there were hard data available. But there is not. That makes good sense. After all, how would somebody go about proving the assertion without running parallel projects and then comparing them? Seems like I remember IBM and others running parallel projects years ago, but I haven't heard of many organizations working like that these days! ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption! http://us.click.yahoo.com/xaxhjB/hdqFAA/VygGAA/NhFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: extremecustomering-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/