Re: XP vs. "Traditional"
"davehane" <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Mar 2003 22:03:51 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-customering |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- In [email protected], "Bill Walton" > > While one may know intuitively that the XP approach will > > yield "better" results, > > "Better" is a dangerous word outside of a specific context / > audience. Are you interested in building better software? > Or in building software better? Do the business mgmt. team > and software development team agree which is more > important? And if so, do they have the same (or anywhere close > to the same) definition of "better"? Thanks ... that's why I put 'better' in quotes! At this point the answer is "I don't know." I can see that my client could do a 'better' job of building software, but have no idea of how management perceives itself. That leads back to my request for hard data ... thanks too for the redirect. Regards, David Hane ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption! http://us.click.yahoo.com/xaxhjB/hdqFAA/VygGAA/NhFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: extremecustomering-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/