Re: Digest Number 135
George Paci <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:50:17 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mike Johnson wrote: > Forgive the nerdish lack for understanding the reference... > angler/fishing? Forgive the nerdish in-joke. It's a reference to /The Diamond Age/, by Neal Stephenson -- a good read, which I don't want to spoil for anyone by explaining too much. Email me for spoilers. Now on to the meat of the topic: > > Most of my projects are done remotely (XP and/or otherwise), and I've > noticed that continuous communication is really important - regardless > of topic... keeping the lines open just allows more opportunities for > work to slip in... I don't get what you're saying in that last sentence: expanding scope? More work communication via more communication in general, on the theory that you can't keep work information out of conversations even if you tried? > Any project that had less that two days a week of > talking with a customer dies... the ones that really fly are daily - > even if you aren't 100% on topic. Well, we get about a day a week with our customer, and are surviving. Two would be much better, granted. And we're trying to get on-site. In our favor, our application is pretty straightforward, and one member of the team acts more or less as a Business Analyst, and does a good job of it. For what it's worth, I sat down and scored our project yesterday, and on a scale of 1 to 5, where Ron and Kent score 5, we're at 3.0, with a standard deviation of 1.58 (which, interestingly, is /exactly/ the standard deviation of the sequence 1 2 3 4 5). So we're about halfway to full XP, but when it comes to individual practices, we're all over the map. > I thought this was a fundamental idea behind XP - creation is a > continuous dialog... surprisingly, its easy to forget when working > remotely.. > > I hope I didn't sound like I was fishing. What is the sound of one poster fishing? --George Paci Attempts to make a general system for handling anything always seem to end up being programming languages. Worse, because they are small, in-house projects, they end up being scruffy, limited programming languages. -- William Pietri Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xpAdoption/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/