RE: Managing Extreme Programming
Chris Hanson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p05111b04ba4cf813501b@[10.0.1.7]> |
At 1:24 PM -0700 1/16/03, Alleman, Glen B. wrote: >[>] our parent firm has a very large design center in India (civil and >construction engineering) and the motivation is hourly wages for >equivalent work - not the disrespect. My point was that people who are not qualified to judge whether the work is actually equivalent are just assuming it is and making decisions based solely on up-front cost. If you're actually getting equivalent work for a lower price you're very, very lucky. All too often I see people who work for third-world consultancies asking very basic and confused questions in newsgroups and on mailing lists relating to the technologies their firms claim all sorts of high-quality expertise in. (And it's not a problem with their English skills, either -- those are generally perfectly fine.) >Our local poster child for >outsourcing is Quark with 80% of the code written in India. So if you >use Quark Express as a tool your experiencing the $10/hour developers >(more cost than that I think). Funny you should mention Quark. I know Quark, I know people who have worked there and I developed several plug-ins for QuarkXPress a few years back. QuarkXPress has historically been a little buggy and obtuse, even though they had a whole lot of top-notch developers working on it in Denver. Then one day they decided to lay off their American developers and ship all the development to the third world (in this case, India) "to save money." From what I hear the latest release, QuarkXPress 5, is a net decrease in quality and doesn't have the features Quark's customers were looking for. QuarkXPress 6 is a huge revision -- necessary to get it to run natively on Mac OS X -- and it doesn't show any signs of shipping soon. I'm also on a lot of technical mailing lists and newsgroups where Quark's new developers have been asking technical questions. They are *nowhere near* the caliber of Quark's old developers, at least judging from the quality of their questions. So no, they're not paying less for equivalent work. I see this pattern time and again, and the driver appears to be that people who are not qualified to judge equivalence are just assuming it rather than trying to become qualified. To me, that's a sign of disrespect. -- Chris -- Chris Hanson, bDistributed.com, Inc. | Email: [email protected] Custom Application Development | Phone: +1-847-372-3955 http://bdistributed.com/ | Fax: +1-847-589-3738 http://bdistributed.com/Articles/ | Personal Email: [email protected] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Turn flat surfaces into speakers with the Soundbug. http://us.click.yahoo.com/QWAVSC/onCFAA/xGHJAA/nhFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/