RE: Teams Leaders what are they, and do we need them? - Extension from Re: Re: Do C-Level managers, and business
"Alleman, Glen B." <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:14:37 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Laurent, Just a quick background. From our Project Management SOP: a "project manager" (re leader) acts in one or alternately all the following ways: * Catalyst - making things happen * Process helper - provide real time support for the team and stakeholders * Problem solver - listening actively to all * Resource linker - coordinating the "right" people It may be that this thread treats "leader" as a technical lead, and maybe equates this with architect or chief programmer - but "leader" of the team has many other roles as described above in our domain. > -----Original Message----- > From: Laurent [>] snip > Tell me more. I'm not sure what expectations I have, so I don't know > that I /could/ be surprised or disappointed. > > That's not quite true : I have expectations, which are set by a few > real-life experiences in which the top management "team" was not a > team at all, but a quite dysfunctional group. I'm discounting these > experiences for the time being. > > I'm also asking the question, I just now realize, as an indirect way > of asking Glen how he defines "team". [>] Our team definition is straight out of B-School dictionary. "The team is a basic unit of performance. It melds together the skills, experiences, and insights of several people. It is the natural complement to individual initiative and achievement because it engenders higher levels of commitment to common ends." Here we have removed the semantics of the definition of teams (endless books and articles debate this definition). Instead we tie the definition of a team to performance. Teams and performance are inseparable. A "true" team performs better than a collection of well managed people. This occurs ONLY if there are specific results for which the team is collectively responsible and provided the performance ethic of the firm (org) demands those results. So looking at XP the collective responsibility of the team to deliver working code to the customer's specification can be the basis of a team. Our senior management "team" collectively delivers business results to our customer, so the generic "team" definition holds as well Glen B. Alleman > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption! http://us.click.yahoo.com/FpY02D/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/nhFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/