Re: [extremeprogramming] Origin of term "standup"?

On 11/18/19 12:09 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
> Brevity requires that people are providing just enough info to clue 
> the rest of the team if they need help (whether they actually know 
> they need help or not), but the help must NOT be received during the 
> standup.  I like to reserve optional time after the standup where 
> people can sit and discuss anything that came up in order to make it 
> clear that the standup itself is not for discussion.

I use what I call the "Two Minute Rule": a technical discussion or 
helpful infodump can take place in the Standup—as long as it takes no 
more than two minutes. If we think it'll go over that, or if it hits the 
two-minute limit, defer it to a later conversation.

Deferring to a later conversation involves writing a brief indicator of 
the topic on the board, along with everyone who should be / wants to be 
involved. Usually these discussions can take place right after the 
standup; occasionally, the same person needs to be in two or more, or 
somebody essential has to run. Something about (even informally) writing 
it on the board seems to ensure the discussions actually happen.

—George

   If you're having trouble managing something, consider eliminating it 
instead.



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#160209): https://groups.io/g/extremeprogramming/message/160209
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/56090734/2417047
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/extremeprogramming/leave/4902963/619838065/xyzzy  [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-