Re: [extremeprogramming] Origin of term "standup"?
"Dave Nicolette" <[email protected]> Sat, 23 Nov 2019 17:54:28 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANCM4b+B+RjXoY_JCo47v61da6fWVyh+yGAkRcnoutdC+kbLtQ@mail.gmail.com> |
George, Great observations and food for thought. Thanks! Dave On 11/23/19, George Dinwiddie <[email protected]> wrote: > It's my observation from watching small groups of people working > together that it's almost universally common that some people will take > charge and direct the common effort and others will get quiet, > abdicating any such role. > > It's also my observation that, even in a small team working together > daily, people notice different things, interpret the things they notice > differently, and assign different significance to those interpretations. > People often think that because they are immersed in a common experience > that there's no need to talk about it. This appears to not be so. > > Groups of technically oriented people often want to optimize the work > process to those activities needed for the technically oriented output, > and overlook those that are focused on the needs of humans and groups of > humans working together. Yes, you can have a standup and not get any > value from it. You can also not have a standup and avoid providing a > convenient mechanism for taking advantage of the differences in > observation, interpretation, and significance made by the entire team. > > If you've got a really good team facilitator, they'll likely notice this > and help bring it out. If they're really excellent, they'll convince the > team to work in a fashion where it can more easily come out without them > acting as a middleman to make it happen. They might use a simple > technique such as a daily standup to create such an opportunity. > > - George > > On 11/22/19 10:50 AM, Dave Nicolette wrote: >> OK, that's closer to what I thought it was for. In any case, mobbing >> is not a substitute for Everything Else. It seems to be useful for (a) >> keeping everyone aligned in the small, (b) knowledge-sharing among >> team members, (c) keeping WIP to a minimum. If you haven't heard >> proponents talking about mid-term and long-term planning in the >> context of mobbing, it's probably because those things are out of >> scope for the narrow topic of mobbing, and not because they don't >> understand the value of those things. That's my guess, anyway. >> >> On 11/22/19, Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> wrote: >>> It was initially for ensuring you're on track to make the Sprint Goal, >>> which >>> is a larger goal than the daily grind. I've not seen much from the >>> mobbing >>> center about longer term planning, it's as if mobbing solves everything. >>> More a matter of discursive style than actual claims, I freely grant. >>> >>> R >>> >>> sent from iPad, probably via Mars. Errors, if any, are not mine. >>> [email protected] is a better address for me, maybe. >>> >>>> On Nov 22, 2019, at 10:18 AM, Dave Nicolette <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes, one does those. I must have misunderstood the purpose of the daily >>>> standup. Didn't know it was for big-picture stuff. My bad. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > * George Dinwiddie * http://blog.gdinwiddie.com > Software Development http://www.idiacomputing.com > Consultant and Coach > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#160310): https://groups.io/g/extremeprogramming/message/160310 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/56090734/2417047 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/extremeprogramming/leave/4902963/619838065/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-