Re: [extremeprogramming] What has changed for you over the past 20 years?
"Slava Imeshev via Groups.Io" <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Dec 2019 15:33:13 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yep. Something similar to Scrum / Agile Alliance would but for engineering practices would be great. Make it attractive to be certified as a software developer. > On Dec 4, 2019, at 3:14 PM, Avi Kessner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Huh, this really got me thinking. > Here is what I would like to see if I had millions of dollars and lots of influence. > > The Continuous Coding Foundation, which functions like an open source foundation for Continuous Coding practices. > The foundation offers training and certification in graduated Continuous Coding practices. > > Practices can belong to 1 of four levels. Abandoned, Sandbox, Incubation, and Graduated. > > Examples of Abandoned practices, would be known antipatterns or projects which are found to have negative indicators when data is collected on them. For example, brittle tests. > > An example of a sandbox practice would be Test && Commit || Revert. It's a well defined practice with a declared goal and has multiple articles on the topic. But lacks data on it's effectiveness, but could in theory have data collected and it's effectiveness proven. > > An example of an Incubation practice would be Red Green Refactor. It's a common practice who's practitioners report gains when combined with other practices. But it lacks data on it's benefits when done in isolation , and there might be evidence that if done without full understanding, can cause harm. > > Then an example of graduated would be practices which have been studied or reported on in academic /trade journals with clear data demonstrating that companies who adopt these practices deliver better software than those that don't. For example, quick iterations between tests and production code. > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, 00:34 Avi Kessner via Groups.Io <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > If I were to market XP today I would call it "Continuous Coding". So you do CC, then CI, then CD. You could shorten this to C3, and bring XP back in a full circle. > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 23:22 Slava Imeshev via Groups.Io <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Robin, > > I think it’s a great idea to build a sellable brand for XP. How about 'Effective Programming', as in delivering results? > > Slava > >> On Dec 4, 2019, at 10:42 AM, R Dymond <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hey Ron! >> >> Yes I believe Howard could invest *a lot* if he saw a route to growing these practices. >> >> A couple ideas: >> Agree that this needs a major rebranding. "Safe" sells, "extreme" is a terrible brand for an industry practice. James Gosling, working at Sun got marketing and branding involved and thats why we got the great branding for Java. >> >> How do we make these ideas cool? Can we get the top tech celebrities advocating and pitching for these ideas? By celebs I mean mainstream tech celebs like Linus Torvalds, some of these guys https://www.quora.com/Who-are-the-best-engineers-at-Google-Why <https://www.quora.com/Who-are-the-best-engineers-at-Google-Why> >> And also tech business leaders who can influence the CXO crowd. >> >> >> Robin Dymond, CST >> Managing Partner, Innovel >> www.innovel.net <http://www.innovel.net/> >> www.scrumtraining.com <http://www.scrumtraining.com/> >> Direct: (804) 239-4329 >> twitter: @robindymond >> Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/robindymond <https://www.linkedin.com/in/robindymond> >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 9:17 AM Ron Jeffries <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Hi Robin, >> >> Nice to see you here! >> >> sent from iPad, probably via Mars. Errors, if any, are not mine. >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> is a better address for me, maybe. >> >> > On Dec 4, 2019, at 12:58 AM, R Dymond <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > Being in the Scrum camp more than XP, in every CSM I overview in detail TDD, CI, Pairing, Mobbing and Swarming. Also explain that you have to look at XP, not Scrum for great ideas on how to make great quality software. >> >> I wish we knew how many CSTs do that. I think what we do know is that even that apparently doesn't work, as your own story below tells. >> > >> > I am at a loss on how to sell these ideas though. At a client who I started working with Scrum in 2010 I have trained most the staff on Scrum. They have over 1000 developers. We sold a total of 2 XP/TDD immersion courses with a well known XP Coach after strenuous internal marketing from HR and finally a Dev Sr Mgr assigning people to the classes. This same company spends millions per year on dev training and regularly sell out courses on Swift, C++, python, r, react, vmware, AWS, Azure, tensorflow etc. etc. Budget isn't the issue, demand for XP practices training is the struggle. >> > >> > So in 20 years we still do not have the business case we need to convince developers to widely adopt and spread these ideas. >> >> It's a puzzlement. I've been talking with Howard Sublett (Scrum Alliance Chief Product Owner, for those who don't know) about the developer problem. He's interested, and I think he'd put some money behind it, but I'm at a loss as to how to effectively help. It's not clear what to do. >> >> Ah well, >> >> R >> >> >> > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#160400): https://groups.io/g/extremeprogramming/message/160400 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/39418691/2417047 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/extremeprogramming/leave/4902963/619838065/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-