Re: Learning a new language every year can be dangerous.
"philip reed" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.language-of-the-year |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for posting these. I was too lazy to hunt them down for myself. This context helps. I still think the other guy is overreacting, to wit: > You are *clearly* trying to be a smart-ass by using complicated > terminology that only few people are acquainted with, *clearly on > purpose*. I don't think it's clear at all, but the guy's first point about the netiquette of asking a question in your subject line is spot-on. If nothing else, people just tune out the subject line when they read emails. If you must, reproduce the question from the subject line verbatim in the text. IMO the whole brouhaha could have been averted if Dan had made his second post on there, #5 in the thread, "Well, the seminal articles are by Martin Fowler," his first post instead. Ask the question, include a sentence or two explaining what it is or why you're ignorant of its applicability to C++, and be done with it. It only takes 30 seconds more to make post #5 rather than post #1. Agonizing over the response took much more time. It's time well-spent in the sense that it's beneficial for all of us to discuss tactics for more effective communication, but it's not necessarily time well-spent for Dan if he's trying to get a straight answer. Regards, Philip On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Wayne <wayne-Lt/[email protected]> wrote: > > I found this thread amusing so I looked up your questions on Google. > ...The second is found here: > > http://objectmix.com/c/375425-c-culture-use-dependency-injection-inversion-ofcontrol.html > > Yes, one guy did call you a smart-ass but then your question was kind of > terse. You really need to look at it from the other persons view. Here > you are asking him to take time out of his busy life to help you. You > ask a question that has so little information it probably going to take > him 15-20 minutes on Google just to figure out what you're talking > about. Then it going to take more time for him to write a response. I > probably wouldn't have called you a smart-ass but I would not have > answered your question either. I find it hard to put more effort into > answering a question than was put into asking it. > > So here's my question. Were you really serious in asking these questions > or just trolling? -- Philip Reed, Web developer http://philipreedtech.com Web. Made simple.