Layer 2-7 Switch Module for IBM eServe BladeCenter config
"Moriarty, Shawn" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
To get around the 8 ports limitation on the VIP you need can create another VIRT with the same IP and a different virtual server number and add the remaining 4. HTH. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:58:12 +0000 From: S. Stef?n Sigur?sson <[email protected]> Subject: [load balancing] Layer 2-7 Switch Module for IBM eServer BladeCenter config problem To: Load Balancing Mailing List <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" We are setting up a new office Communicator in our network and it requires a SLB for the Enterprise pool. I was thinkin of yousing an old "Layer 2-7 Switch Module for IBM eServer BladeCenter" witch I replaced a year back on or primary webcluster. The problem I am haveing with the config is that the Enterprise pool requires 12 ports but the SLB only allows for 8. I was intending to do a non port loadbalancing but I am haveing prolems configuring the box for that. ************************************* The ports I need are: TCP 5060, TCP 5061, TCP 5065, TCP 5069, TCP 5071, TCP 5072, TCP 5073, TCP 5074, TCP 8404, TCP 135, TCP 443 and TCP 444. ************************************* Now the current config I have is: /c/l3/if 1 ena addr 10.1.2.200 mask 255.255.255.0 broad 10.1.2.255 /c/l3/gw 1 ena addr 10.1.2.254 /c/slb/adv mnet 10.1.2.0 mmask 255.255.255.0 /c/slb/real 1 ena rip 10.1.2.41 weight 10 /c/slb/real 2 ena rip 10.1.2.42 weight 10 /c/slb/group 1 health icmp add 1 add 2 /c/slb/port INT8 server ena /c/slb/port INT9 server ena /c/slb/port EXT1 client ena server ena intersw ena /c/slb/virt 1 ena vip 10.1.2.50 layr3 ena /c/slb/virt 1/service 5060 group 1 pbind clientip /c/slb/filt 1 ena action allow vlan any /c/slb/port EXT1 filt ena add 1 ************************************* The problem I cant seem to get past is that even if I do "layr3 ena" I still have to assign the "group 1" inside a virt 1/service (5060). I have confirme the SLB is functioning on the specified port 5060. Is there any way to do this without ports?, Just a straigt IP loadbalancing without any ports assigned? I know my firmware is old (20.2.2.7) and fully intend to update it but first I like to know if this is possible. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://vegan.net/pipermail/lb-l/attachments/20090316/3dfad2e4/attachment -0001.html ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l End of lb-l Digest, Vol 26, Issue 2 *********************************** _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki