Re: Re : serveriron predictor

Surya ARBY <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Use the reponse-time predictor.

It's the best choice in your situation. here is what I found :

"Response time only – The ServerIron selects the real server with the fastest response time."

regards,

Surya

--- En date de : Mar 23.6.09, Reynald Mahinay <[email protected]> a écrit :

De: Reynald Mahinay <[email protected]>
Objet: Re: [load balancing] Re :  serveriron predictor
À: "Load Balancing Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Date: Mardi 23 Juin 2009, 11h46




 
 






Hi
Surya, 

   

First
off, many thanks to your reply.  

   

These
are the only options for the predictor command on our serveriron; 

   

 
least-conn 

 
least-local-conn 

 
least-local-sess 

 
local-weighted 

 
response-time 

 
round-robin 

 
weighted 

   

The
"response-time" is the one close to your suggestion. But its not
"least response time",  which I guess means the opposite - serveriron
will then select the real server with the fastest response time. That looks
good for our setup. In addition, you mentioned in your email below some kind of
"combo" predictor. Can I use response time plus weighted here? That
is based on the above options we have on our box. If yes, can you give me
sample config? 

   

Regards, 

Reynald 

   



From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Surya
ARBY

Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:13 PM

To: Load Balancing Mailing List

Subject: [load balancing] Re : serveriron predictor 



   


 
  
  Do you have some kind of "least response time"
  of "fastest" predictor available ?

  

  Otherwise Weighted round robin (or weighted least conn) may be a good choice
  if you tune the weight according to the hardware specs of the servers.

  

  regards,

  

  Surya

  

  --- En date de : Mar 23.6.09, Reynald Mahinay <[email protected]>
  a écrit : 
  

  De: Reynald Mahinay <[email protected]>

  Objet: [load balancing] serveriron predictor

  À: [email protected]

  Date: Mardi 23 Juin 2009, 7h29 
  
  
  Hello, 
    
  Just trying to
  find what's the best predictor to use if you have a group of servers that has
  differect hardware specifications (e.g. processor, memory,etc.). We have a
  chasis serveriron here (350), and we wan't to ease the load for those lower
  machines that are under heavy loads. Our current predictor is set to
  "least local sessions" and the "Leas Session" guy looks
  good but unfortunately its available for stackable device only. 
    
  Appreciate your
  help on this guys. 
    
    
  Thanks and
  regards, 
  Reynald 
    
  
  
  

  -----La pièce jointe associée suit----- 
  
  _______________________________________________

  lb-l mailing list

  [email protected]

  http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l

  Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive

  http://lbdigest.com
  Load Balancing Digest

  http://lbwiki.com
  Load Balancing Wiki 
  
  
 


   



 


-----La pièce jointe associée suit-----

_______________________________________________
lb-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest
http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki

_______________________________________________
lb-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest
http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.