Re: Re : serveriron predictor
Rubens Kuhl <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> least-conn > least-local-conn > least-local-sess > local-weighted > response-time > round-robin > weighted I suggest the weighted predictors. Heavy loads are prone to cause instability with response-time or least-conn, with the server that was most responsive been killed by the next wave of connection setups that will all go to that server. Unless the balancer can override this behavior with a max new connection per second rate, I advise to use static balancing, weighted by the effective http power(measured with ab or your favorite http load tool), not simple CPU clock math. Rubens _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki