Re: Re placement to CSS

MaximK <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Kamlesh, 

Have a look at Radware's Appdirector :

http://www.radware.com/Products/ApplicationDelivery/AppDirector/default_FeatureBenefit.aspx




Kamlesh Mungekar wrote:
> 
> We have css11505 load balancers  configured as a box-to-box
> redundancy. We are thinking of moving away since they are almost
> reaching end of life cycle.
> Does anyone has any opinion which would be the best replacement for
> it? We use load balanacer for webfarm load balancing.
> Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> lb-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
> Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
> http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest
> http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacement-to-CSS-tp24469954p24471164.html
Sent from the Load Balancing mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
lb-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest
http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki