Re: Replacement to CSS
"Milind Kulkarni (mkulkarn)" <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:27:54 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4A90369EC3D15C4F91C73F46BBA068E708548286@xmb-sjc-22d.amer.cisco.com> |
Hi Kamlesh, The answer depends on your use case and what you are trying to do in big picture. Details around web farm load balancing use case will help. I am Cisco ACE Product Manager and in our opinion Cisco ACE is (obviously J) the best replacement - in terms of features, price points, roadmap and global support. We realize that customers have many options, so thanks in advance for consideration to ACE. Feel free to unicast ([email protected]) if you have more questions. Thanks, Milind -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of Kamlesh Mungekar Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 2:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [load balancing] Replacement to CSS We have css11505 load balancers configured as a box-to-box redundancy. We are thinking of moving away since they are almost reaching end of life cycle. Does anyone has any opinion which would be the best replacement for it? We use load balanacer for webfarm load balancing. Thanks! _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l <http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l> Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive <http://vegan.net/lb/archive> http://lbdigest.com <http://lbdigest.com> Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com <http://lbwiki.com> Load Balancing Wiki _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki