Re: Replacement to CSS

"Milind Kulkarni (mkulkarn)" <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:27:54 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general
Message-ID <4A90369EC3D15C4F91C73F46BBA068E708548286@xmb-sjc-22d.amer.cisco.com>
Hi Kamlesh,

The answer depends on your use case and what you are trying to do in big
picture. Details around web farm load balancing use case will help. 

I am Cisco ACE Product Manager and in our opinion Cisco ACE is
(obviously J) the best replacement - in terms of features, price points,
roadmap and global support. We realize that customers have many options,
so thanks in advance for consideration to ACE.

Feel free to unicast ([email protected]) if you have more questions.

Thanks,
Milind

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of Kamlesh Mungekar
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 2:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [load balancing] Replacement to CSS

We have css11505 load balancers  configured as a box-to-box redundancy.
We are thinking of moving away since they are almost reaching end of
life cycle.
Does anyone has any opinion which would be the best replacement for it?
We use load balanacer for webfarm load balancing.
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
lb-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
<http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l> 
Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
<http://vegan.net/lb/archive>  http://lbdigest.com <http://lbdigest.com>
Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com <http://lbwiki.com>  Load
Balancing Wiki

_______________________________________________
lb-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest
http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki