Re: Replacement to CSS
"Tony Varriale" <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:23:28 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Flamboyan, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <006701ca0419$50a7ace0$f1f706a0$@com> |
If you are a Cisco shop, take a look at the ACE appliances. Before you buy, make sure that your existing requirements/features on the CSS are well defined. Then, make sure the ACE supports them. tv -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kamlesh Mungekar Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 4:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [load balancing] Replacement to CSS We have css11505 load balancers configured as a box-to-box redundancy. We are thinking of moving away since they are almost reaching end of life cycle. Does anyone has any opinion which would be the best replacement for it? We use load balanacer for webfarm load balancing. Thanks! _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki