Re: Replacement to CSS
[email protected] Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:38:17 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF1E96AC4C.8045AE52-ON862575F3.0065F939-862575F3.00666227@corp.rgbk.com> |
point #1, i'd still have to disagree with. that's going to be part and
parcel of almost any load-balancer configuration, regardless of what you
call it. the actual cli is still much closer to ios/mqc than it is to
arrowpoint/webns, no matter the name. examination of 'show run' on the css
vs. the ace illustrates the point pretty well. point #2, i was not aware
that there was feature disparity in that regard between the appliance and
the service module. interesting. point #3, what specific information would
you want to insert? the certificate info/signature that the client is
providing? i must admit ignorance on this part - i've not had much
experience with using client certs in this manner.
--
robbie
Surya ARBY
<arbysurya@yahoo.
fr> To
Sent by: Load Balancing Mailing List
lb-l-bounces@vega <[email protected]>
n.net cc
[email protected], Load
Balancing Mailing List
07/14/2009 01:23 <[email protected]>
PM Subject
Re: [load balancing] Replacement to
CSS
Please respond to
Load Balancing
Mailing List
<[email protected]>
Hi.
In fact there are similiraties between CSS CLI and ACE CLI (rserver, servfarm, inservice...)
Also OSPF RHI is supported on ACE module (not appliance and it's not on the radar as far as I know).
Also when using SSL offload, inserting SSL infos related to a specific session (client's certificate insertion) is currently not available.
regards,
Surya
router# show problem | include solution
--- En date de : Mar 14.7.09, [email protected] <[email protected]> a écrit :
De: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Objet: Re: [load balancing] Replacement to CSS
À: "Load Balancing Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], "Load Balancing Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Date: Mardi 14 Juillet 2009, 15h43
i'd have to take exception to this. the cli is nowhere near to being close
- the ace is far closer to mqc on ios than anything the css or arrowpoint
ever did. i'm also pretty sure that in A2(1.0) and later, rhi is supported
with ospf. additionally, what exactly do you mean that they "don't support
certificate insertion in http headers"?
--
robbie
Surya ARBY
<arbysurya@yahoo.
fr> To
Sent by: [email protected], Load
lb-l-bounces@vega Balancing Mailing List
n.net <[email protected]>
cc
07/14/2009 01:01 Subject
AM Re: [load balancing] Replacement to
CSS
Please respond to
Load Balancing
Mailing List
<[email protected]>
Just a quick comment on this point, currently, if using SSL offload, ACE (module and appliance) don't support certificate insertion in HTTP
headers,
also it's not GSLB capable (Cisco use another appliance, the GSS) and OSPF RHI for VIPs is not supported on the appliance (but you can use an IP
SLA
probe and conditionnal static route redistribution on the upstream router).
If you want to stay with the same vendor check the feature parity between the ones used in your CSS config and the ACE (appliance, the module
requires a Catalyst 6500 chassis with a sup720 and the whole bundle is quite expensive :) )
Also there is a migration tool from CSS to ACE configurations (the CLI is pretty close)
My other experiences : all LB vendors (cisco, f5, citrix, foundry, radware...) implement the same features so go for the easiest solution to manage
or the lowest price, depending on your requirements :)
regards,
Surya
--- En date de : Mar 14.7.09, Tony Varriale <[email protected]> a écrit :
De: Tony Varriale <[email protected]>
Objet: Re: [load balancing] Replacement to CSS
À: "'Load Balancing Mailing List'" <[email protected]>
Date: Mardi 14 Juillet 2009, 2h23
If you are a Cisco shop, take a look at the ACE appliances. Before you buy,
make sure that your existing requirements/features on the CSS are well
defined. Then, make sure the ACE supports them.
tv
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Kamlesh Mungekar
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 4:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [load balancing] Replacement to CSS
We have css11505 load balancers configured as a box-to-box
redundancy. We are thinking of moving away since they are almost
reaching end of life cycle.
Does anyone has any opinion which would be the best replacement for
it? We use load balanacer for webfarm load balancing.
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
lb-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest
http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki
_______________________________________________
lb-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest
http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki
_______________________________________________
lb-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest
http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki
_______________________________________________
lb-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest
http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki
_______________________________________________
lb-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest
http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki
_______________________________________________
lb-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest
http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki