load balancer models and performance
Andrejus Baranovskis <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:25:40 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello list, Looking at load balancer options to purchase for our medium sized company. We’ve been looking at F5, Netscaler and Cisco. We were looking for a capacity of 1-2 Gbps SSL/load balance. We got a little confused with F5 models. 1600 series was out of question as it’s datasheet used to say 750 Mbps and we were looking at 3600 or 6900. However there are new datasheets now which say 1600 is 1 Gbps a nd 3600 is 2 Gbps (used to be 1.5 Gbps). Naturally we are confused. Does anyone have clear numbers for this? Why did the specs change all of a sudden? any change on the CPU/HW? As far as I know these are new models which came out very recently and there is no recent major software release in the devcentral to justify the improvements in the datasheets. Thoughts/opinions? If anyone has field performance experience with these models it will be very valuable for us, we don't have much time to test every vendor and each model. Andre _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki