Re: how to achieve URL hash LB algorithm on ZXTM
Ben Mansell <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:56:22 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes, there's an irony in having two separate features that are in effect opposites of each other :) Going back to the original problem... there may be another solution. Squid supports several kinds of inter-cache communication - ICP, HTCP and CARP. It may be helpful to try setting up some of these to spread the workload and direct requests to the server that has the freshest content. This in combination with some kind of intelligent balancing might be the best solution for this use case. On 06/08/2009 15:27, Kenneth Salchow wrote: > And, in case it wasn't clear, that is in no way a ZXTM issue. I've always > espoused that persistence is the opposite of load-balancing and as Ben > points out--the two are rather discordant. Your results are likely to be > fairly similar with any device on the market given your incongruous goals. _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki