Re: how to achieve URL hash LB algorithm on ZXTM

"Eric Y. Zhang" <[email protected]> Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:02:41 +0800
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
thanks to all of you who discuss this. I learned to many from your threads.
this is the most helpful mailing list I ever been.

I will try to figure out the best way to spread load/maintain the
availability.

thanks again


Eric

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Ben Mansell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, there's an irony in having two separate features that are in effect
> opposites of each other :)
>
> Going back to the original problem... there may be another solution. Squid
> supports several kinds of inter-cache communication - ICP, HTCP and CARP. It
> may be helpful to try setting up some of these to spread the workload and
> direct requests to the server that has the freshest content. This in
> combination with some kind of intelligent balancing might be the best
> solution for this use case.
>
> On 06/08/2009 15:27, Kenneth Salchow wrote:
>
>> And, in case it wasn't clear, that is in no way a ZXTM issue.  I've always
>> espoused that persistence is the opposite of load-balancing and as Ben
>> points out--the two are rather discordant.  Your results are likely to be
>> fairly similar with any device on the market given your incongruous goals.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> lb-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
> Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
> http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest
> http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki
>



-- 
Life is hard

_______________________________________________
lb-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest
http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki