Re: Re : Layer4 and Layer7 TPS
Kenneth Salchow <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:11:40 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4B18A8F75A6384449755BC7784073E9360DC8844D3@exch11.olympus.f5net.com> |
While I might not be quite so exuberant in my response, I will suggest the Surya has a couple valid points. First, however, let me say that, to the best of my knowledge, that post was NOT made by an F5 employee. If it is discovered that it was, it was inappropriate and it will be rectified. IF, however, it truly is simply one of our customers who found some value in our testing, Im happy to see their excitement and enthusiasm. I, personally, believe we do a pretty fair job of presenting the facts; we publish the results regardless of whether we come out on top or not and we provide complete transparency as to the configurations of all devices, testing equipment and methodology. Given the report, the time and the equipment, anyone should be able to produce the same results. I truly believe it is as unbiased as it can be. That being said, I agree with Surya the no matter how unbiased a performance report may or may not be, the true test is how the device performs in YOUR environment with YOUR applications and YOUR business processes. As they say, the proof of the pudding is in the tasting; make sure you get a true taste. If possible, a PoC is something we suggest all our prospective customers do. Anyone who has been a part of this list for any time knows that I am a strong proponent of that philosophy. In the end, thats all that matters. I wish the ADC Expert good luck (Bon Chance, I believe?) in their search for the best product for their needs. If you have any specific questions, Im sure everyone in the list will be happy to give their perspective and input. KJ (Ken) Salchow, Jr. | Manager, Technical Marketing D 651.423.1133 M 612.868.1258 P 206.272.5555 F 206.272.5555 <http://www.f5.com/> www.f5.com From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Surya ARBY Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 12:43 PM To: Load Balancing Mailing List Subject: [load balancing] Re : Layer4 and Layer7 TPS Hello. To me this kind of "performance reports" or "competitive analysis" are just a bunch of bullshit. You'll find a lot of other papers on Citrix / Cisco / any vendor web site with a lot of case studies stating they are the best vendor with the best appliance and that the end customer is the happiest customer in the world with his solution :) Make a POC and setup your own load testing :) The real L4/L7 performance in a specific configuration varies according to the internal architecture of the product you test. Cisco ACE module distributes the load between two NPs according to the result of a hash function to process load balanced flows, Ace appliance relies on a single Cavium Octeon chipset for the data plane, Citrix uses a purely software based appliance, F5 and Foundry use another architectures (barrel processors in foundry boxes are distributed like NPs in cisco ace module)... When you perform load testing it's very important to understand how the box you test really works internally, because results (and comparison) will change with the choosen scenario that's why the "performance report" you mention is necessarily biaised :) regards, Surya --- En date de : Jeu 19.11.09, ADC expert <[email protected]> a écrit : De: ADC expert <[email protected]> Objet: [load balancing] Layer4 and Layer7 TPS À: [email protected] Date: Jeudi 19 Novembre 2009, 19h09 Hi Experts, I was looking for a ADC device that can give best L4 and L7 TPS. After considerable search, I got few things to get clarified before selecting the best. F5 has extensive performance report in its website. http://www.f5.com/pdf/reports/f5-performance-report.pdf I wonder why other vendors did not report in such detail. Even if, there is no free access. I appreciate if some one sends me across cisco, citrix and other vendors performance details. -Thanks. -----La pièce jointe associée suit----- _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 3 KB) - not displayed