Re: BigIP LTM Default persistence failing

Opened a Support Case. My issue appears to be a cosmetic only issue
with the GUI. The behavior I'm seeing is showing what appears to be
proper affinity. In fact, when I disable the fallback persistence of
[source address] then make a connection, I see nothing in the
statistics view but I do seem my session stuck to one node. TAC
recommends going to 9.48.

thanks to all. I'm confident that F5 TAC nailed the issue.

-b


On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Tony Bourke <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Check the date on the BIG-IP. =A0Sometimes if you have the date set wrong=
, the
> cookie expires in the past, so your browsers never send the cookies.
>
> Also, load up HTTPfox (or other browser plug-in) and see if you can see t=
he
> cookies generated by the F5. =A0You can also check the date the cookies a=
re
> set to expire (if they're not session cookies).
>
> Tony
>
>
> On 5/2/2010 10:39 AM, Bill Blackford wrote:
>>
>> Issue: BigIP LTM only using fallback persistence
>> Unit: 1600
>> Ver: 9.45
>>
>> I have a VIP set to use default persistence as Cookie and fall back to
>> use source address. Cookie method is 'HTTP Cookie Insert'
>> Statistics are showing the persistence mode of Source Address Affinity
>> only.
>>
>> Am I missing something?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> -b
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lb-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
> Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
> http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest
> http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki
>



-- =

Bill Blackford
Network Engineer

Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.....
_______________________________________________
lb-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l
Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive
http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest
http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki