RE: [AM] What MDA should be - was ANN: Are You Ready For MDA?

...and that was their first mistake :-) 

Jason Gorman
http://www.objectmonkey.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kari Hoijarvi [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: 11 March 2004 21:35
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [AM] What MDA should be - was ANN: Are You Ready For MDA?
> 
> Yes, they introduced action language. The point I'm trying to 
> make is, that they did not extend any OO language.
> 
> Kari
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Ambler [mailto:[email protected]]
> 
> At 02:19 PM 3/11/2004, you wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Jason Gorman [mailto:[email protected]]
> >
> > > MDA will work when the code IS the model and the model IS 
> the code.
> > > That would require OO languages like Java and C# to incorporate 
> > > UML-specific concepts like association end and multiplicity,
> >
> >In the MDA vision that Mellor et al see, this is not the case.
> >Modeler/Programmer does not need to see the target language, ever.
> 
> Yes, and to do that they needed to introduce a new action 
> semantics language.  You're still programming with their approach.
> 
> - Scott
> 
> For more information about AM, visit the Agile Modeling Home 
> Page at www.agilemodeling.com
> 
> 

For more information about AM, visit the Agile Modeling Home Page at www.agilemodeling.com
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrKDA.bWnbtk.Z2NtYS1h
Or send an email to: [email protected]

For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit:
http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER
--^----------------------------------------------------------------