Re: Almost no pointers (was: Pragmatic Requirements Summary : update)

On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Mário Amado Alves wrote:

> To me it's clear Pragmatic should allow pointers. I proposed the 
> following as a way to keep it simple but elegant (not ugly).
> 
> Address values are implementation-dependent.
> 
> Any addressable entity has an address_of method.
> 
> A function exists that accepts an address and returns the value 
> addressed. An error is indicated if the address is not valid.

Ok, from a human standpoint it will be much easier to not use the 
"address_of" method unless required.  That's a good solution.

-- Matt

-- 
From my heart and from my hand, why don't people understand my intention?


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Free shipping on all inkjet cartridge & refill kit orders to US & Canada. Low prices up to 80% off. We have your brand: HP, Epson, Lexmark & more.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5510
http://us.click.yahoo.com/GHXcIA/n.WGAA/ySSFAA/W4wwlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
pragmatic_lang-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/