Re: Slashdot
"Edward Wilson" <web2ed-/[email protected]> Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:40:10 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.pragmatic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> as it trades performance for flexibility. How flexible do you want your > language to be? > > Cheers, > Steve Steve, excellent post. My favorite /. post was in the form of a question: "Why do I want to learn another scripting language when I have to code in C++ to work anyway?". This question hits at the core for me. If a language can't be used in the common workplace, then it is reduced to a research language, or even less, a play toy. Maybe we should be asking how do we build a kitchen sink language? Perhaps this language should be built on paper, completely, before the first line of code is written. Obviously, everyone has a list of wants in a would be 'super' language. In fantasy, we can all have unlimited features; unfortunately, the laws of physics apply and will force us to make tradeoffs. From my stand point, Pragmatic must be useful for the common developer, otherwise, it will only be differentiated by its syntax, and chosen paradigm(s); and why would someone care about that? -- ed ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/sO0ANB/LIdGAA/ySSFAA/W4wwlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: pragmatic_lang-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/