Re: Re: Pragmatic Requirements Summary : update
"Aryeh M. Friedman" <[email protected]> Tue, 5 Aug 2003 14:57:37 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.pragmatic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Could I (as a newbie/outsider) ask for clarification, or is it > premature? > > --- In [email protected], "Aryeh M. Friedman" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... > > 1) How to seperate code from data in a clean generic paradigm > > neutral manner > > > > Why? One of the nicer aspects of LISP and FORTH (and Perl, Python, > and even xBase) is the ability to construct code on the fly and > evaluate the constructed code/expressions within the current > computation. Admittedly this is not for beginners, but is a very > powerful (pragmatic ;-) tool for some purposes. Introspection is > another such tool that blurs the code/data boundary. Introspection/reflection/whatever is looking at the metadata for the code not the code it self... I think a brian storming session tonight should resolve much of this (at least at the philosphical if not "praticle" level [in the case of language design there is not much difference]). > > > > 3) Exactly where to artifically draw the line between HW ("language > > atomic") and SW (implimented "in" Pragmatic) > > > > That strikes my ear as an implementation issue rather than a > language definition issue. A quick-bootstrap implementation (back Design/definitation/implimentation/whatever in the terms of languages is nothing but many faces of the same coin. > to the FORTH tradition again) might opt for the smallest possible > core language, with all of the rest implemented as "high-level" > definitions/extensions, while a performance-tuned implementation > might opt for highly-tweaked versions of many of the so-called > higher features. This provokes me to the question: If properally designed/implimented this should be invisible to the designer. > Wouldn't it be better to have a precise definition of the > notation and semantics of language features and leave it to > the discretion of the implementor(s) how to make the > bootstrap-versus-performance tradeoffs? Depends on the area your addressing there are no absulutes including this statement. --Aryeh ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/sO0ANB/LIdGAA/ySSFAA/W4wwlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: pragmatic_lang-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/